Yes Holly, there is an Allah - religious tolerance and the Council of
Nicea - by Stan Klos
Yes Holly, There is an
Allah !
Since posting our endorsement of George W. Bush we received
hundreds of emails of support and disgust, not surprisingly, evenly divided.
One email, above all addressed what our founders considered to be the greatest political weakness of
Kings and Queens, religious tolerance. In the wake of this "Holy War"
aberration against the United States of America we must hold fast to the
philosophy that the
reasonable practice of religious tolerance within our borders is
paramount to the world's success against terrorism. I have, reluctantly, decided
to address the following email as a former
Franciscan
Friars of the Atonement
Seminarian and citizen of the United States in the
hopes that Christians embrace this philosophy of United States Founders
more whole heartedly.
On 10/31/2004 at 5:10 AM Holly wrote:
"I enjoyed reading your article Kerry vs. Bush (http://stanklos.com/endorsement/).
I have one comment that will help you to understand the difference between
Allah, the Muslim God, and Jesus Christ, George Bush's' and my God. You see,
Allah never mentions Christ. Allah is a "God" of hate and discontent.
Christ is the God of love ... period. Anyone that mentions their "God"
without mentioning Christ is not worshiping the God of our Ancestors. God is
Christ and Christ is God. To mention one without the other is said to be living
in the dark, not the light. It is also said that they will not be awarded the
eternal life that we can have for the asking, because of Christ's death and
resurrection."
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
Dear Holly,
Thank you for your kind comments and please permit some
lack of brevity license in this reply. Like many Americans, I am searching for an answer
to the mystery of
life and take spiritual instruction seriously. Holly, you maintain that "Allah
is a "God" of hate and discontent" while "Christ is the God of Love."
This is quite a perplexing statement as Christian theology stems from the
God of Abraham. The God of Abraham is the God of Prophet Mohammad.
A study of the Koran clearly purports that Allah created Adam, and then
Eve. Later, Abraham is instructed by Allah to take his son, Ishmael, to a hill
and to sacrifice him, which Abraham prepares to do. This, of course, is a
variance from the Five Books of Moses which maintains it was Isaac who
was to be
sacrificed. As in the Five Books of Moses, Allah stopped Abraham from carrying
out the sacrifice of Ishmael. The Koran's Abraham pleased the deity
by demonstrating his unwavering faith as the very
first true believer in the One Allah.
Today Abraham and Ishmael remain central to Muslim Faith. In
fact all Muslims face Mecca when praying to Allah. Muslims believe that
Abraham constructed a special building on that site, the Kaaba, on a command
from Allah.
In the Koran you will find the entire story of Moses,
including the escape from Egypt, wanderings in the desert, the Ten Commandments, Aaron permitting the worship of the
Golden Calf, and all the major
tenants of faith in the Five Books of Moses. Often in the Koran when Allah chose
to bestow guidance to man, the Angel Jibril (Gabriel) materialized. So many
Biblical characters that are enveloped in the stories of the first Five Books of Moses
are similarly presented in the Koran.
If what you purport, Holly, that "God is Christ and Christ is God," than
surely the Judeo-Christian "God the Father" must be Allah. Just
because the Muslims assert that Jesus was only one of Allah's many prophets and
not God’s only begotten Son doesn't nullify the fact they believe the God of
Abraham is Allah. If Allah is God and Christ is God then doesn't it
stand the test of Christian reasoning that Christ is Allah or Allah is Christ ?
In a nutshell, Jews reject the New Testament, Christians rebuff the Koran,
and Muslims view Jesus as just as another prophet. The common thread,
however, is all three theologies embrace the God of Abraham as their
"Yhwh" (),
"God the Father", or "Allah."
To me, however, your claim that "God is Christ and Christ is
God" is an impenetrable theology. "God is Christ and
Christ is God" was the REVELATION of the first ecumenical
council in 325 A. D. (C. E.). It was Constantine's Council of Nicea that requested a New Testament, from what
historians know to be an editing of thousands of Christian manuscripts and
letters, to be formed for his subjects in The Holy Roman Empire. In fact it
wasn't until the second ecumenical council in 381 A. D. (C. E.), 66 years later, that the
third person in the Trinity was even recognized a full 350 years after the
crucifixion of Jesus Christ. The infallible papal edict of 381 A. D. that
God is the Holy Spirit and the Holy
Spirit is God finally revealed the great mystery of Christianity, three persons in one God.
It was the Nicene Creed of 381 that introduced the word "homoousious"
or "consubstantial" meaning "of one
substance"explaining how only one God can
exist in three different distinct forms. Quite
baffling if you ask me NOW but as a young man I actually
offered a group of Catholic Bishops my solution to this mystery:
Given that we are made in God's image then perhaps, like
the Holy Trinity, we also will exist in three persons.
The Father - each
person all and sundry in the mind of God before birth
The Son - each
person, like Jesus, fulfilling a mission here on earth
The Holy Spirit -
each person fulfilling our final form of spiritual rebirth after death
I know --- I
know --- I know -- How over enveloped I was in theology even back then.
Today, my
foundational problem with "they will not be awarded the eternal
life" visavee theNew Testament is that all the 2nd and
3rd Century primary source documents, letters, and manuscripts that the 1st and
2nd Ecumenical Council
abridged, changed and declared as HERESY have been lost or destroyed. There are no
gospels or epistles in Aramaic or even Greek that are of the period of Jesus Christ!
Yes theologians point to one or two so called 2nd Century A.D. fragments with
contain
less then two paragraphs as primary sources but these fragments are miniscule and on
mediums that are
impossible date. There are no "Dead Sea Scrolls" of Christianity known
despite the fact that all the great apostolic works were gathered under
the Holy Roman Empire in a time of great triumph for Christianity. The earliest New Testament Gospel(s) we have, by any factual
standard, are the Codex
Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus of the mid-4th Century A. D. They
are both in ancient Greek and not easily translated into English due to the
complexity and age of the lexicon.
One of the greatest heroes of the
American Revolution, Charles Thomson, understood this problem and took it upon
himself in his retirement to solve it.
Charles Thomson was the Secretary to the Continental Congress and the United
States in Congress Assembled from its beginning to its end. He kept notes of all
those closed debates in Congress (very little is recorded in the Journals of
Congress). He also administrated the fledgling nation through four Continental
Congress and ten United States in Congress Assembled
Presidents. Charles Thomson was the power behind the the scenes from the
start in 1774 to Confederation Constitution's finish in 1789. It was his name,
along with John Hancock's, that was boldly printed on the 1776
Declaration of Independence
Broadsides. It was through these broadsides and newspapers that
"King and Country" received the news of Independence with Charles Thomson's
name displayed prominently at the bottom as Secretary to the Continental
Congress. The other delegate names were not published until January 1777. Sadly
when it came time for the delegates to sign the engrossed copy of the
Declaration of Independence on
August 2nd they refused Charles Thomson the opportunity to autograph the very
document he ardently supported and then released to the world. After his political
retirement in 1789, Mr. Thomson started to compile his personal journals, notes,
letters and manuscripts along with a narrative of what he recalled happened
behind the scenes in old Continental Congress. Unfortunately, Thomson had a
change of heart and turned instead to mastery of Ancient Greek in the hopes of
translating the Bible of Constantine. He was successful and published
The Holy
Bible, containing the Old and New Covenant, Commonly called the Old and New
Testament; Translated from the Greek which contained the
first English version of the Septuagint that had been published at the time.
His work was considered by biblical scholars in Great Britain to have reflected
high honor on American scholarship. What a loss that decision was,
however, to the scholarship he was most qualified to undertake, the founding of
the United States!
It never ceases to amaze me how many
Christian Ministers can insist that each word in their English Bible must be
taken literally when there are several different translation possibilities, as
demonstrated by Thomson and other biblical scholars, for each paragraph. More
importantly, Christianity is a problematic theology from a scholarly standpoint as
the New Testament was formulated 300 years
after the Death of Jesus Christ. The Christian Bible from which
you quote and boldly pronounce "they will not be
awarded the eternal life" demands, if anything, for you to open your mind to
both sides of the question before pontificating infinite damnation or
eradication.
My point is best supported by this literal analogy. Suppose in
2100 A.D. our scholars took the Virginia Declaration of Rights, Declaration of
Independence, Articles of Confederation, the US Constitution, all the 18th
Century constitutions of the States, thousands of books, letters,
manuscripts and resolutions from the founding of the United States and abridged
them into publication the size of the current New Testament. Additionally, upon
the completion of the new text all the originals were destroyed. Would you
accept this publication as the definitive founding document and laws of the
United States? Would you accepted this as the one true "New Testament of the
United States" if the work also lumped in the abridgment of all other
pivotal U.S. Laws and Resolutions from 1789 to 2076?
I have spent the last 5 years of my life pouring over these very
original documents in one small area and have proved, beyond a shadow of a
doubt, that ten men held the Presidency of the United
States under the Confederation Constitution before George Washington. A
case that is slowly but surely righting this one tenant in American History.
Just think what would be revealed if we possessed the primary sources that lead
to the creation of the Christian New Testament?
So, in my humble opinion, the major mystery of Christianity is
not the Holy Trinity but that the source manuscripts are missing. These foundational
tenets of
Christianity are not the gospels according to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
They are the gospels according to the Council of Nicea. Any theologian worth
their salt accepts this as a material fact. The leap of faith is
that the Council of Nicea was divinely inspired when they abridged at least 50
gospels into four in 325 C. E.
It is, therefore, impossible to prove what the apostles 1st hand
account really was of Jesus Christ as the original texts are missing. We do know,
however, quite a bit about the history of Christianity from the Council of Nicea,
325 C. E. to the present. For instance, at the Council of Nicea the
bishops and theologians were bitterly split with some maintaining Jesus was just a prophet
(Future Muslims?),
while others claimed Jesus was the Son of God but a separate "divine entity"
(Arius)
while the Constantine majority held fast to your belief that Jesus is God and God is Jesus
(homoousius).
Unfortunately there are no primary source manuscripts, letters, and carvings in
wood or stone to allow me or anyone else to revisit the ancient and Apostolic texts
to draw
scholarly conclusions. All New Testament scholars must rely on faith
that the Codex Vaticanus
and Codex Sinaiticus (about 425-450 C.E.) are true to the accounts of the Apostles, Mary, Paul, and
Mary Magdalene. It is here, on this point that my journey for truth in the
ancient and Apostolic texts dead
ends. NO primary proofs exist from the time of Christ that can give
evidence that the New Testament is any more
accurate to the Apostolic message for humanity then the Five Books of Moses,
Koran,
Book of Mormon (Where are those gold tablets?) and a host of other wonderfully written theological treatises
to their tenets.
Hopefully Holly you might now understand why I made the statement "Unlike our current President, the God of Abraham
has not enveloped my being with a sense of purpose."
When it comes right
down to it life is first faith in people and second in God as it is humanity (even if with Divine Inspiration)
that records and teaches the theology of
"Yhwh". This is why one must
embrace religious tolerance. Man or Woman can not even comprehend the
intricate workings of a simple
mammal mind let alone begin to understand what the "Divine Plan" is of an
Almighty God for so many generations and earthly cultures. Therefore, one must
be most reticent to question the revelations of God
to any person of intelligence, character and "good will" who purports he
or she has uncovered the great mystery of life through "Divine Intervention."
This is what our founders summed-up as religious tolerance. I am
convinced what the world needs now is more respect for God's wisdom and
revelations to the complex cultures of the earth in so many various forms. What
the world needs now is religious tolerance and the recognition that Allah is
NOT a "God of hate and discontent. "
Yes, Holly, you should continue to purport your faith in all
honesty and in earnest. I greatly appreciate you taking the time to do so. In
this effort, however, you must be like
Diogenes, the 4th Century B.C. philosopher, who used to walk
through Athens in broad daylight carrying a lighted lamp while searching for an
honest man. When you find one, especially when his or her theology differs from
yours, heed our founders’ wisdom and practice religious tolerance. No man or
woman can ever truly know what God has revealed to another who walks a righteous
path. For me, I much rather be able to know a righteous path then be
able to define it. The religious zealots who attacked the World Trade buildings,
Terrorist Arafat (the father of suicide bombings of women and children) and
Jordanian Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
"The
Beheader" are just a few examples of un-righteous men who eloquently warp
the teachings of the Koran. They are messengers" of hate and discontent" not Allah.
With that said, please let me state that I am in awe of your
Faith. It is truly a gift from God. I do agree that we are perpetual
and look forward to seeing you on the other side. May God continue to bless you
with such conviction and peace of mind that the Spiritual Road you travel
leads to everlasting life.
Stanley L. Klos
Now Available in Paperback President Who?
Forgotten Founders Click Here
Who was
the First U.S. President? There were actually four first
Presidents
of the United Colonies and States of America Click Here
Unauthorized Site:
This site and its contents are not affiliated, connected,
associated with or authorized by the individual, family,
friends, or trademarked entities utilizing any part or
the subject's entire name. Any official or affiliated
sites that are related to this subject will be hyper
linked below upon submission
and Evisum, Inc. review.
Please join us in our mission to incorporate The Congressional Evolution of the United States of America discovery-based curriculum into the classroom of every primary and secondary school in the United States of America by July 2, 2026, the nation’s 250th birthday. , the United States of America: We The
People. Click Here